Data Post two data collection
Selfies and other photos:
Photos on linkedin:
Participant 1- Had a profile picture.
Participant 2- Had a profile picture.
Participant 3- Had a account but no profile picture.
Participant 4- Had no account.
Photos on Facebook:
Participant 1- 2 albums of photos one with 10 profile pictures in one and the other holding eight cover photos of either himself or activities that were common as photos.
participant 2-7 albums ranging from 5-8 photos in each doing something active or a photo of himself.
participant 3-10 albums with around 10-15 photos that dealt with family as well as herself and their activities.
participant 4-70 plus albums in photos with at least 20 photos that pertained to something they did or of himself.
Photos on Twitter:
Selfies
Participant 1: 18/125 photos were images of himself in a selfie.
Participant 2: 11/124 photos were selfies of himself.
Participant 3: 43/194 were selfies of herself.
participant 4: 10/200 were selfies.
Posts and reposts:
Trending posts:
linkedin:
participants 1-4 have no active likes, comments, or posts on the site but participants 1-3 do have commentary on their skills as well as work history.
Facebook:
Participants 1 and 2 have no real trends due to inactivity in the last month.
Participant 3 and 4 hold a minimum of 1 post to 5 reposts in the range of 50 of their post they share.
Twitter:
Participant 1 reposted 10 out of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 2: reposted 24 out of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 3: reposted 7 out of the 50 of her posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 4: reposted 19 of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Based off of twitter so far
Likes and comments dealing with things that pertain to their own lives and what their interests are:
No comments were made by participants 1,2, or 4 in the last 50 posts
Participant 1:41 of his likes went to sports and the rest went to either news accounts or food accounts.
Participant 2: 35 of his 50 likes went to sports and gaming while the other went to food and music.
Participant 3: 23 of the 50 likes referred to problems or shows, the other likes went to memes and parody accounts. Although there was at least 6 comments that referred to another account and got a like out of it.
Participant 4: 38 out of the 50 likes referred to politics, sports, or coaching.
Based off the statistical data I have so far I can see a trend in the increase in likes many something due to it carrying over and referencing what is found on all four of these participants accounts pages whether it be a background photo or profile photo most have at least one piece connecting to the other with two participants having profile pictures wearing sports apparel and most of their likes going to sports while participant number four is more towards commentary due to the way her account is written out and how her comments and likes are focused on communicating with her followers. Now for participant 4 having so many photos and different likes on different subjects it is going to be hard to pin point the exact identity he is representing.
Is there any other statistical data that I could maybe look at more or less? Are there any other ways besides direct messaging the data that I have accumulated to the participants on getting my argument across through the use of transcription of what they see in the data compared to what the data is representing. Can an argument be made on whether or not identity is apart of online media everyday and does it represent us and our identity we are trying to perform? What could be a better way to approach the data in a sense that it will show this important piece to social media today? Could this be a good rebuttal against social media having no real meaning and its importance in todays social world especially the debate about there being a difference between online identity and offline identity?
Photos on linkedin:
Participant 1- Had a profile picture.
Participant 2- Had a profile picture.
Participant 3- Had a account but no profile picture.
Participant 4- Had no account.
Photos on Facebook:
Participant 1- 2 albums of photos one with 10 profile pictures in one and the other holding eight cover photos of either himself or activities that were common as photos.
participant 2-7 albums ranging from 5-8 photos in each doing something active or a photo of himself.
participant 3-10 albums with around 10-15 photos that dealt with family as well as herself and their activities.
participant 4-70 plus albums in photos with at least 20 photos that pertained to something they did or of himself.
Photos on Twitter:
Selfies
Participant 1: 18/125 photos were images of himself in a selfie.
Participant 2: 11/124 photos were selfies of himself.
Participant 3: 43/194 were selfies of herself.
participant 4: 10/200 were selfies.
Posts and reposts:
Trending posts:
linkedin:
participants 1-4 have no active likes, comments, or posts on the site but participants 1-3 do have commentary on their skills as well as work history.
Facebook:
Participants 1 and 2 have no real trends due to inactivity in the last month.
Participant 3 and 4 hold a minimum of 1 post to 5 reposts in the range of 50 of their post they share.
Twitter:
Participant 1 reposted 10 out of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 2: reposted 24 out of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 3: reposted 7 out of the 50 of her posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Participant 4: reposted 19 of the 50 of his posts are from trending accounts/posts.
Based off of twitter so far
Likes and comments dealing with things that pertain to their own lives and what their interests are:
No comments were made by participants 1,2, or 4 in the last 50 posts
Participant 1:41 of his likes went to sports and the rest went to either news accounts or food accounts.
Participant 2: 35 of his 50 likes went to sports and gaming while the other went to food and music.
Participant 3: 23 of the 50 likes referred to problems or shows, the other likes went to memes and parody accounts. Although there was at least 6 comments that referred to another account and got a like out of it.
Participant 4: 38 out of the 50 likes referred to politics, sports, or coaching.
Based off the statistical data I have so far I can see a trend in the increase in likes many something due to it carrying over and referencing what is found on all four of these participants accounts pages whether it be a background photo or profile photo most have at least one piece connecting to the other with two participants having profile pictures wearing sports apparel and most of their likes going to sports while participant number four is more towards commentary due to the way her account is written out and how her comments and likes are focused on communicating with her followers. Now for participant 4 having so many photos and different likes on different subjects it is going to be hard to pin point the exact identity he is representing.
Is there any other statistical data that I could maybe look at more or less? Are there any other ways besides direct messaging the data that I have accumulated to the participants on getting my argument across through the use of transcription of what they see in the data compared to what the data is representing. Can an argument be made on whether or not identity is apart of online media everyday and does it represent us and our identity we are trying to perform? What could be a better way to approach the data in a sense that it will show this important piece to social media today? Could this be a good rebuttal against social media having no real meaning and its importance in todays social world especially the debate about there being a difference between online identity and offline identity?
Comments
Post a Comment